DevOps.com

  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Features
    • Most Read
    • News
    • News Releases
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Continuous Delivery
    • Continuous Testing
    • Cloud
    • Culture
    • DevSecOps
    • Enterprise DevOps
    • Leadership Suite
    • DevOps Practice
    • ROELBOB
    • DevOps Toolbox
    • IT as Code
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • DevOps Chats
    • DevOps Unbound
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming
    • On-Demand Webinars
  • Library
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • On-Demand Events
  • Sponsored Communities
    • AWS Community Hub
    • CloudBees
    • IT as Code
    • Rocket on DevOps.com
    • Traceable on DevOps.com
    • Quali on DevOps.com
  • Related Sites
    • Techstrong Group
    • Container Journal
    • Security Boulevard
    • Techstrong Research
    • DevOps Chat
    • DevOps Dozen
    • DevOps TV
    • Digital Anarchist
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • AI
  • Cloud
  • Continuous Delivery
  • Continuous Testing
  • DevSecOps
  • Leadership Suite
  • Practices
  • ROELBOB
  • Low-Code/No-Code
  • IT as Code
  • More
    • Application Performance Management/Monitoring
    • Culture
    • Enterprise DevOps

Home » Blogs » Leadership Suite » The Barriers to Robotic Process Automation, Part 1

Barriers to Robotic Process Automation

The Barriers to Robotic Process Automation, Part 1

By: George V. Hulme on August 21, 2019 2 Comments

It sounds alluring enough: Intelligent bots step up and do the menial tasks humans would rather (probably) not be doing–or employers would rather they not, in order to slash costs. But streamlining business processes with robotic process automation (RPA) isn’t as easy as setting and forgetting a software bot as if it was an automated rotisserie.

Recent Posts By George V. Hulme
  • GitLab Gets an Overhaul
  • IT Spending to Reach $4.4 Trillion in 2022
  • Successful Digital Transformation: It’s About Strategy
More from George V. Hulme
Related Posts
  • The Barriers to Robotic Process Automation, Part 1
  • Automation Anywhere Brings Bot Development to the Cloud
  • DevOps Chats: Robotic Process Automation with Tricentis
    Related Categories
  • Blogs
  • DevOps Practice
  • Enterprise DevOps
  • Leadership Suite
    Related Topics
  • robotic process automation
  • RPA
Show more
Show less

Still, many enterprises forge ahead as if that’s the case. This rush forward is likely one of the top reasons, as consultancy Ernst & Young found, as many as 30% to 50% of initial RPA projects fail.

DevOps Connect:DevSecOps @ RSAC 2022

This isn’t a reflection of RPA technology or its capabilities. It’s generally the result of organizations rushing forward without doing the right upfront work necessary to prepare for heightened software autonomy and automation. To find answers, we reached out to experts to get their thoughts on the most common barriers to the effective enterprise deployment of intelligent automation.

“The number one success factor for intelligent automation is visible sponsorship,” said Jesse Tutt CEO at mattress company Gotta Sleep. Tutt claimed having visible sponsorship is essential because the biggest barrier to RPA success is often resistance from both management and staff.

“Management often have little capacity to allocate time to improvement and secondly resist intelligent automation as they have a perception it may negatively impact staff satisfaction,” said Tutt.

Tutt said the second barrier is the lack of staff with broad skillsets in data, analytics, software development and RPA necessary to succeed. Good data is necessary to support the analytics that will drive the automation.

In addition to data and analytics skills, automation teams also need to be good software developers. Typically, most automation projects are accomplished through direct database or API interaction, Tutt explained.

“Lastly, in cases where systems are antiquated, are only accessible published applications, or which require mouse or keystroke interactions, robotic process automation skills are required,” said Tutt.

Salvatore Stolfo, founder and CTO at Allure Security adds another barrier: the elusiveness of the AI-powered minimum viable product (MVP). Stolfo said, like any complex application, the difficulty is driven predominately by the complexity of the problem, business considerations and computational constraints.

“To achieve an MVP, the performance of the machine learning engine must achieve accuracy levels that make the application work well enough for the intended market solution. There is no magic bullet,” said Stolfo.

Niraj Patel, managing director, artificial intelligence practice at enterprise technology consultancy DMI, said enterprises are floundering when it comes to RPA because they spend insufficient time understanding the customer experience and therefore the ultimate value derived from automation; they lack clean data sources which gets in the way of generating the intelligence; and legacy applications that don’t lend to plug-play of newer modules such as RPA and machine language components; and unrealistic expectations when it comes to robotic software processes.

In part 2 of this story, we will tackle how organizations can beat the barriers to robotic process automation.

— George V. Hulme

Filed Under: Blogs, DevOps Practice, Enterprise DevOps, Leadership Suite Tagged With: robotic process automation, RPA

Sponsored Content
Featured eBook
Hybrid Cloud Security 101

Hybrid Cloud Security 101

No matter where you are in your hybrid cloud journey, security is a big concern. Hybrid cloud security vulnerabilities typically take the form of loss of resource oversight and control, including unsanctioned public cloud use, lack of visibility into resources, inadequate change control, poor configuration management, and ineffective access controls ... Read More
« Software as a Service
Measuring Success in DevOps: Top Four DevOps KPIs »

TechStrong TV – Live

Click full-screen to enable volume control
Watch latest episodes and shows

Upcoming Webinars

Continuous Deployment
Monday, July 11, 2022 - 1:00 pm EDT
Using External Tables to Store and Query Data on MinIO With SQL Server 2022
Tuesday, July 12, 2022 - 11:00 am EDT
Goldilocks and the 3 Levels of Cardinality: Getting it Just Right
Tuesday, July 12, 2022 - 1:00 pm EDT

Latest from DevOps.com

Rust in Linux 5.20 | Deepfake Hiring Fraud | IBM WFH ‘New Normal’
June 30, 2022 | Richi Jennings
Moving From Lift-and-Shift to Cloud-Native
June 30, 2022 | Alexander Gallagher
The Two Types of Code Vulnerabilities
June 30, 2022 | Casey Bisson
Common RDS Misconfigurations DevSecOps Teams Should Know
June 29, 2022 | Gad Rosenthal
Quick! Define DevSecOps: Let’s Call it Development Security
June 29, 2022 | Don Macvittie

Get The Top Stories of the Week

  • View DevOps.com Privacy Policy
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Download Free eBook

DevOps: Mastering the Human Element
DevOps: Mastering the Human Element

Most Read on DevOps.com

What Is User Acceptance Testing and Why Is it so Important?
June 27, 2022 | Ron Stefanski
Rust in Linux 5.20 | Deepfake Hiring Fraud | IBM WFH ‘New No...
June 30, 2022 | Richi Jennings
Chip-to-Cloud IoT: A Step Toward Web3
June 28, 2022 | Nahla Davies
DevOps Connect: DevSecOps — Building a Modern Cybersecurity ...
June 27, 2022 | Veronica Haggar
The Two Types of Code Vulnerabilities
June 30, 2022 | Casey Bisson

On-Demand Webinars

DevOps.com Webinar ReplaysDevOps.com Webinar Replays
  • Home
  • About DevOps.com
  • Meet our Authors
  • Write for DevOps.com
  • Media Kit
  • Sponsor Info
  • Copyright
  • TOS
  • Privacy Policy

Powered by Techstrong Group, Inc.

© 2022 ·Techstrong Group, Inc.All rights reserved.