DevOps.com

  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Features
    • Most Read
    • News
    • News Releases
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Continuous Delivery
    • Continuous Testing
    • Cloud
    • Culture
    • DataOps
    • DevSecOps
    • Enterprise DevOps
    • Leadership Suite
    • DevOps Practice
    • ROELBOB
    • DevOps Toolbox
    • IT as Code
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Techstrong.tv Podcast
    • Techstrong.tv Video Podcast
    • Techstrong.tv - Twitch
    • DevOps Unbound
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming
    • On-Demand Webinars
  • Library
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • On-Demand Events
  • Sponsored Content
  • Related Sites
    • Techstrong Group
    • Container Journal
    • Security Boulevard
    • Techstrong Research
    • DevOps Chat
    • DevOps Dozen
    • DevOps TV
    • Techstrong TV
    • Techstrong.tv Podcast
    • Techstrong.tv Video Podcast
    • Techstrong.tv - Twitch
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • Sponsor
  • AI
  • Cloud
  • Continuous Delivery
  • Continuous Testing
  • DataOps
  • DevSecOps
  • DevOps Onramp
  • Platform Engineering
  • Low-Code/No-Code
  • IT as Code
  • More
    • Application Performance Management/Monitoring
    • Culture
    • Enterprise DevOps
    • ROELBOB
Hot Topics
  • Where Does Observability Stand Today, and Where is it Going Next?
  • Five Great DevOps Job Opportunities
  • A Freelancer's Workflow
  • Azure Migration Strategy: Tools, Costs and Best Practices
  • Blameless Integrates Incident Management Platform With Opsgenie

Home » Blogs » Gartner Evaluates APM Tools for DevOps

Gartner Evaluates APM Tools for DevOps

Avatar photoBy: Jonah Kowall on March 10, 2016 2 Comments

In 2009, Gartner analyst Mark Nicolett created the Critical Capabilities report. Over time, this document became paired to individual Magic Quadrant reports, and in 2014, Gartner mandated that Critical Capabilities be paired with each Magic Quadrant. Instead of graphically plotting vendors on a x- and y-axis, this research takes a deeper look at a product and its fit for specific use cases.

Recent Posts By Jonah Kowall
  • The Role of APM in Continuous Integration and Continuous Release
  • Performance Monitoring, another view
Avatar photo More from Jonah Kowall
Related Posts
  • Gartner Evaluates APM Tools for DevOps
  • Electric Cloud Positioned the Highest for Execution in Gartner’s Application Release Automation Magic Quadrant for Second Year in a Row
  • Newgen Recognized in 2023 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Enterprise Low-Code Application Platforms for Third Year in a Row
    Related Categories
  • Application Performance Management/Monitoring
  • Blogs
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Enterprise DevOps
    Related Topics
  • application performance monitoring
  • Critical Capabilities
  • gartner
  • Magic Quadrant
Show more
Show less

So how does this pertain to DevOps?

TechStrong Con 2023Sponsorships Available

In its latest “Critical Capabilities of Application Performance Monitoring” research, Gartner notes, “Because of its wide lifecycle purview, the DevOps release team often leverages many of the capabilities found in APM suites.” Since the foundation of DevOps is to foster collaboration among the two, typically disparate teams, modern application performance monitoring (APM) solutions are geared perfectly to help encourage this feedback loop. “When examining the capabilities valued by this buyer, APM tooling is critical when attempting to quickly assess the quality (and effectiveness) of a recent release. Detecting and diagnosing issues must be done quickly, which often requires in-depth data sourced from multiple, integrated tools,” according to Gartner.

“Much of the activity of APM technology is focused on detecting and providing insight into root causes. Identification of the impact on system and application resources is based on existing (or proposed) transaction-level trends,” the report continues. “This capability provides IT operations and DevOps release teams with the ability to tell the (line of business) and application owners the potential impact for any planned changes or continuation of resource consumption trends. Although capacity-planning tools have often filled this role, APM suites increasingly offer predictive analytics capabilities for shorter-term horizons”

Of course, we can’t ignore the key to DevOps success: culture. However, no tool—no matter how good—can foster the right type of culture. John Rakowski, my current colleague and ex-Forrester analyst, wrote a compelling ebook on the intangibles that successful DevOps teams need.

The Critical Capabilities research report provides a comprehensive and technical product analysis ranking APM suites from 15 vendors on critical APM capabilities across five different usage scenarios, including DevOps. The capabilities assessed for each use case included business analysis, service monitoring, anomaly detection, distributed profiling, application debugging and workload planning.

The vendors evaluated were AppDynamics, AppNeta, BMC Software, CA Technologies, Dell, Dynatrace, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, JenniferSoft, ManageEngine, Microsoft, Nastel Technologies, New Relic, Riverbed Technology and Tinygun.

The report is free of charge and can be downloaded here.

Filed Under: Application Performance Management/Monitoring, Blogs, Editorial Calendar, Enterprise DevOps Tagged With: application performance monitoring, Critical Capabilities, gartner, Magic Quadrant

« Case Study: Sauce Labs Covers Animoto’s Testing Needs
Chef Makes DevOps Workflow Faster and Safer for Enterprises Amid Rapid Business Growth »

Techstrong TV – Live

Click full-screen to enable volume control
Watch latest episodes and shows

Upcoming Webinars

Automating Day 2 Operations: Best Practices and Outcomes
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 - 3:00 pm EST
Shipping Applications Faster With Kubernetes: Myth or Reality?
Wednesday, February 8, 2023 - 1:00 pm EST
Why Current Approaches To "Shift-Left" Are A DevOps Antipattern
Thursday, February 9, 2023 - 1:00 pm EST

Sponsored Content

The Google Cloud DevOps Awards: Apply Now!

January 10, 2023 | Brenna Washington

Codenotary Extends Dynamic SBOM Reach to Serverless Computing Platforms

December 9, 2022 | Mike Vizard

Why a Low-Code Platform Should Have Pro-Code Capabilities

March 24, 2021 | Andrew Manby

AWS Well-Architected Framework Elevates Agility

December 17, 2020 | JT Giri

Practical Approaches to Long-Term Cloud-Native Security

December 5, 2019 | Chris Tozzi

Latest from DevOps.com

Where Does Observability Stand Today, and Where is it Going Next?
February 6, 2023 | Tomer Levy
Five Great DevOps Job Opportunities
February 6, 2023 | Mike Vizard
Azure Migration Strategy: Tools, Costs and Best Practices
February 3, 2023 | Gilad David Maayan
Blameless Integrates Incident Management Platform With Opsgenie
February 3, 2023 | Mike Vizard
OpenAI Hires 1,000 Low Wage Coders to Retrain Copilot | Netflix Blocks Password Sharing
February 2, 2023 | Richi Jennings

TSTV Podcast

On-Demand Webinars

DevOps.com Webinar ReplaysDevOps.com Webinar Replays

GET THE TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK

Most Read on DevOps.com

OpenAI Hires 1,000 Low Wage Coders to Retrain Copilot | Netflix Blocks Password Sharing
February 2, 2023 | Richi Jennings
Automation Challenges Holding DevOps Back
February 1, 2023 | Mike Vizard
Jellyfish Adds Tool to Visualize Software Development Workflows
January 31, 2023 | Mike Vizard
Cisco AppDynamics Survey Surfaces DevSecOps Challenges
January 31, 2023 | Mike Vizard
Red Hat Brings Ansible Automation to Google Cloud
February 2, 2023 | Mike Vizard
  • Home
  • About DevOps.com
  • Meet our Authors
  • Write for DevOps.com
  • Media Kit
  • Sponsor Info
  • Copyright
  • TOS
  • Privacy Policy

Powered by Techstrong Group, Inc.

© 2023 ·Techstrong Group, Inc.All rights reserved.