DevOps.com

  • Latest
    • Articles
    • Features
    • Most Read
    • News
    • News Releases
  • Topics
    • AI
    • Continuous Delivery
    • Continuous Testing
    • Cloud
    • Culture
    • DataOps
    • DevSecOps
    • Enterprise DevOps
    • Leadership Suite
    • DevOps Practice
    • ROELBOB
    • DevOps Toolbox
    • IT as Code
  • Videos/Podcasts
    • Techstrong.tv Podcast
    • Techstrong.tv Video Podcast
    • Techstrong.tv - Twitch
    • DevOps Unbound
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming
    • On-Demand Webinars
  • Library
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • On-Demand Events
  • Sponsored Content
  • Related Sites
    • Techstrong Group
    • Container Journal
    • Security Boulevard
    • Techstrong Research
    • DevOps Chat
    • DevOps Dozen
    • DevOps TV
    • Techstrong TV
    • Techstrong.tv Podcast
    • Techstrong.tv Video Podcast
    • Techstrong.tv - Twitch
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • Sponsor
  • AI
  • Cloud
  • Continuous Delivery
  • Continuous Testing
  • DataOps
  • DevSecOps
  • DevOps Onramp
  • Platform Engineering
  • Low-Code/No-Code
  • IT as Code
  • More
    • Application Performance Management/Monitoring
    • Culture
    • Enterprise DevOps
    • ROELBOB

Home » Blogs » Observability Vs. Monitoring: What’s the Difference?

Observability Vs. Monitoring: What’s the Difference?

Avatar photoBy: JJ Tang on October 27, 2021 Leave a Comment

As more and more IT organizations pivot from strategies rooted in monitoring to ones that aim to achieve observability, one of the first questions that teams need to answer is, “What is the difference between the two?”

That’s a somewhat loaded question because there are some differences of opinion out there regarding what, exactly, distinguishes monitoring from observability. But in general, the differences can be distilled into two main points, as we will explain.

TechStrong Con 2023Sponsorships Available

What is Observability and What is Monitoring?

The first step in understanding the difference is to understand what each term means on its own.

The classic definition of observability is that it is the use of external data outputs to understand the internal state of a system. In the IT industry specifically, observability could be defined as the use of logs, metrics and distributed traces to understand the state of a complex software system.

Meanwhile, monitoring is the process by which data is collected from a system. In IT, monitoring is how teams collect logs, metrics and traces and move them to a place where they can be analyzed.

Similarities

There are some obvious similarities between the two. Both involve (at least in part) the collection of diverse sets of data. Both also serve the goal of helping teams identify problems within their software stacks and deliver a high-quality user experience.

Two Key Differences

But the similarities end there. Ultimately, monitoring and observability are distinct concepts and processes, with two main differences that distinguish them from each other.

Monitoring collects data. Observability interprets it.

The first is that observability focuses on interpreting and understanding data, whereas monitoring is merely the collection of data.

In this sense, you can think of monitoring as one of the processes that makes observability possible. But observability requires more than monitoring. In addition to collecting data, observability also involves the correlation of data from multiple sources and the identification of relevant patterns or anomalies within that data.

Monitoring Tells you What is Wrong. Observability Tells you Why it’s Wrong

The second main difference is that monitoring simply alerts you when something goes wrong. Observability goes further by helping you understand why it’s wrong and how to fix it.

For example, a monitoring tool might tell you that your application’s response rate is no longer adequate. But you need observability to figure out which specific microservices within the application are causing the problem. Using that information, you can plan and execute an effective response to reliability issues using an incident management platform.

With monitoring alone, you only know that something is broken, not how to fix it.

Observability and Monitoring: Better Together

Although it’s common to speak in terms of “observability versus monitoring,” the reality is that you can’t have observability without monitoring. (You could monitor without observing, but doing so would significantly reduce your ability to understand and resolve problems quickly.)

So, don’t think of it as an either/or proposition. Think of them as concepts and practices that go hand-in-hand, even if they perform different functions.

Recent Posts By JJ Tang
  • What Does AIOps Mean for SREs?
  • The Evolution of Incident Management
  • Defining Availability, Maintainability and Reliability in SRE
Avatar photo More from JJ Tang
Related Posts
  • Observability Vs. Monitoring: What’s the Difference?
  • LogicMonitor Expands Reach and Scope of Observability Platform
  • How Monitoring and Observability Feed Each Other to Create a Holistic Approach to Visibility
    Related Categories
  • Application Performance Management/Monitoring
  • Blogs
  • Continuous Testing
  • DevOps Culture
  • DevOps Practice
    Related Topics
  • application performance monitoring
  • DevOps metrics
  • logs
  • observability
  • traces
Show more
Show less

Filed Under: Application Performance Management/Monitoring, Blogs, Continuous Testing, DevOps Culture, DevOps Practice Tagged With: application performance monitoring, DevOps metrics, logs, observability, traces

« Codenotary Uses Immutable Database to Verify Software Artifacts
Sysdig Adds Cloud Access Controls to DevSecOps Platform »

Techstrong TV – Live

Click full-screen to enable volume control
Watch latest episodes and shows

Upcoming Webinars

Moving Beyond SBOMs to Secure the Software Supply Chain
Tuesday, January 31, 2023 - 11:00 am EST
Achieving Complete Visibility in IT Operations, Analytics, and Security
Wednesday, February 1, 2023 - 11:00 am EST
Achieving DevSecOps: Reducing AppSec Noise at Scale
Wednesday, February 1, 2023 - 1:00 pm EST

Sponsored Content

The Google Cloud DevOps Awards: Apply Now!

January 10, 2023 | Brenna Washington

Codenotary Extends Dynamic SBOM Reach to Serverless Computing Platforms

December 9, 2022 | Mike Vizard

Why a Low-Code Platform Should Have Pro-Code Capabilities

March 24, 2021 | Andrew Manby

AWS Well-Architected Framework Elevates Agility

December 17, 2020 | JT Giri

Practical Approaches to Long-Term Cloud-Native Security

December 5, 2019 | Chris Tozzi

Latest from DevOps.com

New Relic Bolsters Observability Platform
January 30, 2023 | Mike Vizard
Let the Machines Do It: AI-Directed Mobile App Testing
January 30, 2023 | Syed Hamid
Five Great DevOps Job Opportunities
January 30, 2023 | Mike Vizard
Stream Big, Think Bigger: Analyze Streaming Data at Scale
January 27, 2023 | Julia Brouillette
What’s Ahead for the Future of Data Streaming?
January 27, 2023 | Danica Fine

TSTV Podcast

On-Demand Webinars

DevOps.com Webinar ReplaysDevOps.com Webinar Replays

GET THE TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK

Most Read on DevOps.com

What DevOps Needs to Know About ChatGPT
January 24, 2023 | John Willis
Microsoft Outage Outrage: Was it BGP or DNS?
January 25, 2023 | Richi Jennings
Optimizing Cloud Costs for DevOps With AI-Assisted Orchestra...
January 24, 2023 | Marc Hornbeek
Dynatrace Survey Surfaces State of DevOps in the Enterprise
January 24, 2023 | Mike Vizard
Deploying a Service Mesh: Challenges and Solutions
January 24, 2023 | Gilad David Maayan
  • Home
  • About DevOps.com
  • Meet our Authors
  • Write for DevOps.com
  • Media Kit
  • Sponsor Info
  • Copyright
  • TOS
  • Privacy Policy

Powered by Techstrong Group, Inc.

© 2023 ·Techstrong Group, Inc.All rights reserved.