Imagine this: You have just finished implementing a big, enterprise-level software. The project took months (or years), cost a fortune and required countless hours of work. But you did it! Now, it is finally time to reap the ROI from your investment. But guess what? You also have to deal with the consequences.
Integration: A Dream Come True or a Never-Ending Nightmare?
Your shiny new innovative system doesn’t exist in isolation. It needs to communicate with other systems. And how is that done? Through integrations.
In the past, this meant a more tedious process with file transfers, spreadsheets and manual workarounds. Today, it is all about application programming interfaces (APIs) and middleware, connecting:
- ERP ↔ Supply Chain System
- ERP ↔ Inventory System
- ERP ↔ Vendor Systems and so on
Each connection is a delicate web of API calls, middleware and message queues — basically, a high-stakes effort of digital matchmaking between two systems that were never really meant to talk to each other. One system speaks French, the other grunts in a Greek dialect and middleware is the overworked translator trying to facilitate seamless communication without chaos.
And these aren’t small, one-off data syncs. We are talking about thousands of transactions per day — millions per month. The more users, the more operations, the more data flying back and forth, trying to keep everything running smoothly or spiraling into chaos.
The Integration Party: Where Wine Meets Emergency Support
Let me tell you a fun story about a real project.
After two years of hard work, hundreds of hours of meetings — both virtual and in-person — brainstorming, arguing, implementing and coding, we finally rolled out a brand-new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system to replace an old, custom-built dinosaur.
But instead of fully switching to the ERP’s inventory system, the company decided to stick to its old inventory software. They were promised seamless integration. And, frankly, they couldn’t live without it. They had too many custom processes they thought were too important to lose.
“It will be easy!” said the partners. “Flawless data flow!” they assured. “API technology is a universal language for all systems.”
Well… not exactly.
The two systems operated in completely different ways, especially when it came to handling inventory transactions. And that’s where the IT technical teams came in — to bridge the gap, untangle the mess and make it work anyway.
Trying to streamline transactions, handle exceptions and manage special cases became the new daily grind.
The Go-Live
Fast forward to go-live — everything seemed almost perfect.
No major issues, no fires and no 2 a.m. crisis calls. Additionally, let me tell you there is no such thing as ‘no issues’ in any project. Nevertheless, much to our surprise, this project only had minor issues.
The CEO decided to throw a dinner party in honor of our success for all the teams that had contributed to the project.
And then, it happened.
While we were at the party, one of the main connection agents — the glue between the ERP and inventory system — crashed. Suddenly, no more transactions were passing through.
Orders? Stuck.
Shipments? Frozen.
Bills of lading? Not printing.
Moreover, it was nearing the end of the second shift and people wanted to go home after a long working day. So, some of them ended their shift a bit early to avoid the hassle of staying around and troubleshooting.
Phones started ringing. Emails and texts started flooding in. Panic set in.
Then came the real kicker: The managed services team did not have access to troubleshoot the integration agent. Only the technical team could fix it.
And where was the technical team? At the party. Drinking wine. Lots of it.
So now, a group of half-drunk engineers had to jump on a call and troubleshoot a mission-critical integration failure.
You can imagine how well that went.
By the time the issue was resolved, the damage was already done. Thousands of failed transactions had to be manually corrected, inventory mismatches had to be reconciled and most importantly, we learned a valuable lesson: A ‘seamless’ integration is only seamless until it is not.
Key Takeaway: Integrations Can be Problematic
Modern API-based integrations are reliable, efficient and faster than ever. The technology has evolved, proving itself across countless organizations with real-world success stories.
Let us not forget the brilliant technical minds who, with the right direction, motivation and management, can navigate the complex puzzles of integration and make even the messiest systems talk to each other.
But here is the question: Just because two systems can be integrated, does that mean they should? Is that integration truly needed or is it just an ambition of a long-term system strategy?
As an IT person, this type of project works in my favor, so perhaps I shouldn’t talk about it. But the truth is, integration projects can be risky. The more transactions and transaction types you integrate, the more risk you introduce into the equation. The more different the systems are, the more chaos can unfold. Issues will keep surfacing like a contagious sneeze in a crowded room.
This means that before choosing a product, organizations need to consider how the systems can actually work together.
How Different Can They Really Be?
A common argument: ‘How different can they be? Every system is just capturing transactions, right?
Wrong. Every system has its own design, structure and logic — and sometimes, those do not just differ; they conflict.
For example, one system batch processes transactions, while the other requires real-time sync.
Different database structures: One requires unique item IDs, while the other happily allows duplicates. One specific transaction type is designed with header/detail logic, while the other only stores details.
And what is the result?
- Data conflicts
- Lost transactions
- A giant, expensive mess to untangle
Sure, a strong technical team can work through these puzzles, but at what cost?
More Dependencies = More Vulnerabilities
The more dependencies you create, the more fragile your ecosystem becomes, especially when you are working with a brand-new product that your team has no internal knowledge of.
Suddenly, you do not just need a general IT team — you need integration specialists. People who do not just know how to connect systems, but also how to debug, troubleshoot and untangle them when they inevitably fail.
Have a Plan B for When Integrations Fail
This is what we call business continuity. When your integrations fail (because they will), do you:
- Have a backup process that allows transactions to keep flowing?
- Have an emergency troubleshooting team available 24/7?
- Have proper logging and alerts to catch failures before they spiral out of control?
If your entire business grinds to a halt just because one API call fails, then guess what? You do not have an integration. You have a single point of failure disguised as a solution.
Final Thought: Invest in What You Need, Not What Looks Good
Organizations need to invest in the software they need, not just what looks innovative and exciting on paper. A well-chosen system with fewer dependencies will always bring better ROI than a ‘groundbreaking’ solution that relies on layers of fragile integrations.
There must be a thorough and proper internal evaluation of the basic requirements of the new software. At the end of the day, it is not about how modern or feature-rich a product is, it is about how well it works for the business.
The next time your client says, ‘Don’t worry, the integration will be seamless’, ask yourself: ‘How many drunk engineers will it take to fix it at 10 p.m. at a party on a Saturday’?
That is the real ROI calculation.
