Welcome to The Long View—where we peruse the news of the week and strip it to the essentials. Let’s work out what really matters.

This week: The Open App Markets Act polls well among devs, Germany fines a website for using Google Fonts, and the New York Times buys Wordle for an unfeasible sum.

1. Antitrust Bill Would Open Up App Stores

First up this week: The Open App Markets Act seems like a big hit with developers. In a survey, more then 80% wanted lawmakers to pass this bipartisan Senate bill.

Analysis: But 30% of nothing is nothing

One of devs’ biggest complaints is Apple’s 30% cut of all revenue—including in-app purchases. Many devs have also experienced random rejections of submissions to the stores. And these seem to be the main driving forces behind devs’ calls to tear down any walls around the gardens. But they should be careful what they wish for—users might not see it the same way.

Karl Evers-Hillstrom: 8 in 10 app developers back measure to rein in Google, Apple

The Coalition for App Fairness, [an] industry group for app developers, is pushing Congress to pass the Open App Markets Act. [The] bipartisan Senate bill … would block app stores from favoring their own in-house apps in searches, requiring developers to use their payment systems and preventing users from downloading apps from third-party stores.
…
Developers surveyed … complained about exorbitant fees … and expressed how they’d experienced difficulty getting their apps featured or accepted by app stores. Just 13 percent of app developers surveyed oppose the bill. … The margin of error is plus or minus 7.11 percentage points.
…
The proposal, co-sponsored by Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), is scheduled for a committee markup this week. The CEOs of Apple and Google have personally lobbied lawmakers to abandon [such] antitrust legislation.

Wouldn’t that just kill the proverbial golden goose? No, says this Anonymous Coward:

The only reason Apple has any success with the iPhone is because developers write apps for it, it’s no different to Windows in that regard. … If Apple’s app store is so good then everybody from developers to end users will continue to use it and nobody will use third party app stores.
…
Obviously there is a clear profit motive to exclude any competition in the app store space. But I don’t understand how people can claim that Apple makes great products and simultaneously argue that they couldn’t possibly survive competition on the platform.

But Dr. Edith Müdyk—@BabyHueby—doesn’t sound hopeful this will go anywhere:

Too bad policy isn’t dictated by public opinion.

2. German Court Fines Site for Using Google Fonts Without Consent

Did you know you need to get permission from a European user before you remote-load a Google Font? You do now.

Analysis: Schrems II comes home to roost

More GDPR popups ahoy! A German court has “clarified” that websites and apps should obtain informed consent before loading content—if loading it would reveal a user’s IP address to a third party. Luckily, the fine was only $110—this time, but if the perp was to do it again, the court threatened 2500× that amount.

Thomas Claburn: Website fined by German court for leaking visitor’s IP address via Google Fonts

A German court fined an unidentified website €100 ($110) … for violating EU privacy law by importing a Google-hosted web font. [It] passed the unidentified plaintiff’s IP address to Google without authorization and without a legitimate reason for doing so. And that violates … GDPR.
…
The website could have avoided this drama by self-hosting the font. … The ruling explicitly cites this possibility to assert that relying on Google-hosted Google Fonts is not defensible under the law.
…
The ruling directs the website to stop providing IP addresses to Google and threatens … a fine of €250,000 for each violation, or up to six months in prison, for continued improper use of Google Fonts. … These data privacy judgments … reflect the consequences of the EU Court of Justice’s 2020 decision to strike down the Privacy Shield data protection arrangements that had previously allowed US companies to exchange data with European partners under “Standard Contract Clauses.”

Isn’t that ridiculous? And surely not the intention of GDPR? Aristos Mazer very much disagrees:

This is very much the intended consequence, with a lot of analysis going into this regulation. … Even if that means redesigning foundations of the network.
…
Forcing sites to stop transferring data in any way shape or form to Google, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, etc. … is exactly the goal. [It’s been] repeatedly validated by polls of EU citizens.

And indeed, the point is to get “informed consent.” Here’s Hans Neeson-Bumpsadese:

“To proceed beyond this point … your IP address needs to be shared with a 3rd party.” Would they click on that? … I know at least one person who would read that as, “If I click that link then you will tell people where I live.” (I know because they got a pop-up like that once, and phoned me in a state of mild agitation.)

3. Wordle Sold to NYT for Over $1M

Josh Wardle, a Welsh developer living in New York, has sold this winter’s social gaming hit to his state’s namesake newspaper of record. The New York Times thinks it’ll be a useful addition to its Games section. But the price tag is incredible.

Analysis: Nice payday for Josh

How much? Hard to see how the Times is going to make money out of this. Tomorrow’s word must be: NOROI.

Alexis Benveniste: The Sudden Rise of Wordle

In less than six months, Wordle has gone from a gift to a viral sensation, to … part of The New York Times. … Josh Wardle, a software engineer in Brooklyn, created the game as a gift for his partner … and it exploded in popularity.
…
Nearly two months later, 300,000 people played it. … The buzz around the game can be attributed to the spoiler-free scoring grid that allows players to share their Wordle wins across social media.
…
Wordle was acquired for an undisclosed price in the low seven figures.

In other words, north of $1 million. Not bad for a quick, one-dev hack by Josh Wardle:

The game has gotten bigger than I ever imagined (which I suppose isn’t that much of a feat, given I made the game for an audience of one). … I feel so grateful for the personal stories some of you have shared with me.
…
[But] I’d be lying if I said this hasn’t been a little overwhelming. [So] I am incredibly pleased to announce that I’ve reached an agreement with The New York Times. … I’m thrilled they will be stewards of the game.

But “RIP Wordle,” mourns _xeno_, seemingly speaking for many:

It’s about to be bogged down with trackers, and then later, ads. … A paywall is almost certainly on its way—The New York Times very carefully said it would “initially remain free.” … Not surprisingly, there are already plenty of clones. … There’s no way for the New York Times to make money off this.

The Moral of the Story: No disguise will hide one’s true character.

You have been reading The Long View by Richi Jennings. You can contact him at @RiCHi or tlv@richi.uk.

Image: Masahiro Miyagi (via Unsplash; leveled and cropped)